Colovesical Fistula Complicating Diverticular Disease: A 14-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Colovesical fistulas (CVF) constitute the most common type of spontaneously occurring fistulas associated with diverticular disease. One-stage laparoscopic resection has been shown to be feasible, but studies comparing this approach to open surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for CVF of diverticular origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to July 2014, 37 colectomies were performed for diverticular disease-related CVF. Twenty-eight patients who underwent resection and primary anastomosis were divided in 2 groups: the laparoscopic surgery group (group A) and the open surgery group (group B). We have analyzed the following parameters: operative time, complication rate, hospital stay, recurrence, and early mortality rate. RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age, sex, diverticulitis episodes, previous abdominal surgery, and body mass index.The mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group B: 175 versus 237 minutes (P=0.011). There was a faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit in group A (2 vs. 13; P=0, 0002). However, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to serious postoperative morbidity [(Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5) 4 vs. 0; P=0.098)] and with respect to hospital stay (10.5 vs. 9.5 d; P=0.537). There was no recurrence during a median follow-up of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis should be considered a safe and feasible option for the management of diverticular CVF. Despite progresses in minimally invasive colorectal surgery, the conversion rate and morbidity are still high.

Primary Closure Versus Biliary Drainage After Laparoscopic Choledocotomy: Results of a Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of primary closure (PC) and biliary drainage (BD), after the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones by choledocotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2014, 102 patients underwent laparoscopy for lithiasis of the CBD. Intraoperative cholangiography was systematically performed, followed by choledocoscopy, depending on the size of the CBD. RESULTS: Eighty (78.4%) of the 102 patients underwent laparoscopic stone extraction by choledocotomy, and were assigned to 2 groups: PC (group A, n=25), and BD (group B, n=55). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age (62.3±26.1 vs. 66.0±19.3 y; P=0.53), the percentage of women (72.0% vs. 76.4%; P=0.68), body mass index (25.9±6.1 vs. 26.9±4.4 kg/m; P=0.52), and CBD diameter (11.6±3.1 vs. 12.1±3.8 mm; P=0.59). The mean durations of surgery and of hospital stay were significantly shorter in group A: 179±38 versus 211±57 minutes (P=0.02) and 5.4±2.0 versus 8.4±3.2 days (P<0.001). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of serious postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5): 2 versus 4 (P=1). In group B, bile drain removal was complicated by choleperitoneum in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: With shorter durations of surgery and hospital stay, equivalent postoperative morbi-mortality, and an absence of the specific morbidity due to bile drainage, PC may be considered a safe and feasible option for the laparoscopic management of CBD stones by choledocotomy.